Why I am a Deist
July 11, 2007
Like many others throughout the United States, I decided at a fairly young age to become a Christian by going forward and accepting Jesus as my Lord and Saviour. At this time, my convictions weren’t exactly strong. I went forward because some of my friends were Christians, I had been going to church all my life, and I was at a Christian event. Circumstances just came together for me.
Throughout the next 10 years or so, I dove head-first into the world of Church and Christianity. I was reading books on Christian Apologetics, learning all I could about the intellectual properties of being a Christian. I served in Church, went to Sunday school, and attended and even led a bible study group. However, I still question to this day whether my devotion was heartfelt or a sense of responsibility.
Over the past couple of years I have gone through a real soul-searching period of my life. After examining what I truly believed, I realized that I cannot honestly proclaim myself to be a Christian. I have too many problems with the tenants of Christianity as well as organized religion. Instead, I discovered that my beliefs tend toward the path of Humanism. I do believe in the natural goodness of humanity, the beauty of our creativity, and especially our incredible power of reasoning.
Unfortunately, in visiting many Humanist websites today, instead of honest articles written in the interest of the human condition, I find vitriolic attacks on religion and those who believe in God. There must be another way. While I don’t hold to the tenants of Christianity, I feel no animosity toward it.
Enter Deism.
Deism, that old form of belief system that seems to have disappeared since the age of the founding fathers, is truly where I seem to have found a home. I now consider myself a Deist because:
1. I believe that nature loudly proclaims an intelligent Creator;
2. I believe that humans’ ability to reason not only separates us from lower animals, but also gives us the incredible ability to fix our own problems; and
3. I cannot, as a matter of conscience, choose to believe in any religion that proclaims to be the only way to eternal life.
I list number 3 above not as a matter of “fairness” (i.e. what about those who never heard of Christianity, Islam, whatever), but as a matter of intellectual honesty. After examining my time as a Christian, I discovered that I never truly had a “relationship” with Jesus Christ, although I certainly prayed to, and thought I did. Instead, I was believing in the divinity of Jesus so he would save me from eternal damnation. This is, I believe, horribly self-serving. The simple thought of entering a relationship with anyone, purely to use that person, is among the highest “sins” that man can commit.
There are many other reasons for my leaving Christianity, including my inability to comprehend any rhyme or reason to the entire Christian story. That is, perhaps, a later post. For my purposes here and now:
I love humanity, I love being a human; I believe that humans have incredible potential for advancement and world stabilization through our reason; I love nature, I believe that nature loudly proclaims a creator; and I love the peace of knowing that at the end of the day, all that really matters, is how I lived today.
July 11, 2007 at 6:29 pm
Hmmm…very thought provoking. I’ve been tempted by deism before but I don’t think I can make that jump. I guess the difference between us is that I do not see the evidence of a creator in nature as you do. I see no reason for a creator to exist. But I will say I have an awful lot of respect for deism, my only problem that still remains is how one justifies the belief in a creator. All very interesting though.
I wonder whether you considered Spinoza’s God?
July 11, 2007 at 8:25 pm
I agree with you, sort of, but in a way this is all a bit irrelevant. This is all semantics – and semantics, politics, rhetoric, doctrine, is what keeps believers of all faiths from living in faith, rather than just talking about it. The bulk of what the major world religions say – if summed up into one priniciple – is to love and respect your creator by loving and respecting creation. If people would stop arguing over semantics and actually do the world would be a better place.
I am a Christian, and yes, probably only because I grew up in a Christian household. However, does that really matter? We are all dealt a certain hand in this life – what matters is how you play the cards. I try to make the most of the cards I was dealt – love your God by loving your neighbor. I try not to talk about it too much – I try my best to do it. It is in the experiential living out of faith that one finds proof for the existence of God – call me a Pollyanna, but love is of itself a miracle.
July 20, 2007 at 9:02 am
“I do believe in the natural goodness of humanity, the beauty of our creativity, and especially our incredible power of reasoning.”
Please forgive me I mean no harm, but I really burst out laughing when I read this sentence. Where do you live? It must be really separated from reality. I’m sure you have heard someone say that we can not go through even one day with out sinning. Haven’t you proved it to yourself? Though our sins might be considered small (by us), still it is the opposite of natural goodness. If we have an incredible power of reasoning why is the world in this shape. If we are basically good why do we kill each other and steal and lie and rape and……
“Instead, I was believing in the divinity of Jesus so he would save me from eternal damnation. This is, I believe, horribly self-serving. The simple thought of entering a relationship with anyone, purely to use that person, is among the highest “sins” that man can commit.”
But that is why He came and allowed Himself to be horribly murdered. His purpose was and is to be used. It is self-serving for us to accept Him! If there is a God you can’t do anything for Him. In a relationship He is the only one who can do anything. The only thing we can rightly do is to accept what He offers. To do otherwise is to insult Him as He went to great lengths to offer paradise to us. It doesn’t make sense if you apply human intellect to Jesus (the way humans normally think), but if there is a God would expect Him to do things the same way man would.
“There are many other reasons for my leaving Christianity, including my inability to comprehend any rhyme or reason to the entire Christian story.”
It seems so logical and clear to me that I have a hard time understanding why it is not to others.
Both sides of the question (Is Jesus real) create attacks because to tell someone else they are wrong hurts their pride (a worldly attribute). Whereupon they take a defensive position and only consider their side of the argument. This in effect limits their ability to honestly consider the others views. Yes, I have been guilty in the past and may be in the future, but I’m working on it.
July 20, 2007 at 9:30 am
astudent,
Thanks for the comment. As far as sinning, you’re assuming first off that I agree with the concept. I don’t. As far as bursting out laughing and thinking I live in a different world, why are you focused on the negative acts that some people do? Haven’t you noticed the good that a vast majority of people do automatically throughout their daily lives: Holding doors for people, picking something up off the floor for someone. Yes these are small examples, but I would argue that there is more goodwill in the vast majority of people than evil sinfulness.
As far as incredible reasoning skills: Do you really believe that humanity does NOT possess this? Sure there are still problems, however, the whole point of this is not to say that we are perfect, it is to say that should mankind decide to use the reasoning skills for the betterment of society, we could achieve incredible things. Why are we not there? Why are there all these problems? My argument would be that Mankind has not decided to work together for the betterment of mankind. Will it ever happen, doubtful. (see my post on nationality, religion, culture etc…) However, that does not mean that it’s impossible.
As far as the selfishness aspect of living Christianity, that is your perspective, one which I will not argue. I however, cannot accept a god like that. I cannot accept the notion that I can, without full devotion of heart and love to this person, enter a relationship and expect salvation.
As far as logic of Christianity, again, that’s great that you find it so logical and clear. To me, it makes no sense.
As a former Christian, I have been on both sides. I am looking honestly at them, and I came up on the other side.
July 20, 2007 at 2:10 pm
I’ve just stumbled across your blog and have appreciated your honesty as well as respect as you have discussed what’s on your mind. Too many people spew venom at Christianity when they find fault. There are a lot of issues here, and it is great to look at them through an intelligent lens.
On the topic of deism, I wrote a post a while back that can be found here: http://minds2mentes.wordpress.com/2007/02/08/the-problem-with-deism/ You might also appreicate the postings under the topic of truth, which I do a fair bit of writing about.
I hope that in your quest you find what you are looking for.
July 20, 2007 at 3:53 pm
Krista,
Thanks for the comment. I really appreciate it. I’ll take a look at your post. You’re right, there are a lot of issues, but that’s what happens I suppose when one makes a decision this big.
Best wishes.
August 27, 2007 at 12:42 am
“The simple thought of entering a relationship with anyone, purely to use that person, is among the highest ’sins’ that man can commit.”
That’s a great point that I never even thought about. Using Jesus, even if he wanted to get used, is still morally wrong. Great insight.
October 22, 2008 at 4:41 pm
I am with you on this. My existence unto itself is all the proof I need that there is a creator. Stand on a mountain, gaze at the splendor of it all and tell me there is no creator. I have spent many years studying different religions, Mormonism, Baptist, Catholic and even Jahova`s Witnesses. All in a search for my belonging. None of which provided that sense of belonging. I guess I refuse to believe that I have to rely on mans interpretation of Gods word, I do not feel the need to have faith in scripture, I have faith in a creator. As a child I found no comfort in the preachings of most churches because I could not understand how such a loving God could wish to cast me into the lake of fire for being Human.
I too am a Deist. And I see the grandeur of it all, there must be a creator, a higher power, the grand watchmaker.
November 16, 2008 at 12:20 pm
I am not sure what you would call me. I lean toward Humanism but I believe in an Impersonal God. I don’t believe a God is controlling what we do or the sorrow in the world. This may sound a bit off but if you have ever studied the Samaritan tablet you would know where I’m coming from. I think that life began on this planet by another planet colliding with this one. I also believe that visitors from another planet created us by combining their DNA with that of the creatures of this planet in effect making us. But so far I am a creationist in a way because my thinking would be what created the Universe. So I am a creationist in the type of thinking but I also don’t believe in life after death, I don’t believe that “God” controls us in anyway other than in creation. I don’t claim to know how any of it works. I believe in moral values that help us as a people just for the fact that it helps us as a people. I would say I am Secular Humanist except I do believe in God.
August 23, 2009 at 12:04 am
im 16 and i have already defined myself as a deist. it happened when i went on a camping trip with my parents. I looked up to the stars and knew that the universe is just too perfect to be derived from chance. and i knew religion is just too oppressive for me to even want to be associated with. i just hope more people will think and question instead of adhere to absurd rules given by other people. think for yourself and find your path and soul, this will lead you (myself) to deism.
October 21, 2009 at 3:24 pm
This is exactly what I’ve been trying to put into words for the past couple months.I’m glad someone out there share my views. I like the idea of humanism, but it seems as if every humanist group I come across is more concerned with trash-talking theists than furthering humanity.